Restricted countries
The Anjouan Gaming Authority licence excludes a substantial list of markets. Read this before you deposit — the restriction surfaces at withdrawal, not at signup.
| Country | Status | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| United States | Blocked | Confirmed across every source we checked |
| United Kingdom | Blocked | UKGC licensing requirement |
| Germany | Blocked | GlüStV state treaty |
| France | Blocked | ANJ monopoly framework |
| Spain | Blocked | DGOJ licensing requirement |
| Netherlands | Blocked | KSA licensing requirement |
| Austria | Blocked | Confirmed across every source we checked |
| Australia | Blocked | Interactive Gambling Act |
| Belgium | Blocked | Reported by most sources |
| Italy | Blocked | Reported by some sources — verify |
| Poland | Blocked | Reported — but Blik appears in the cashier, see below |
| Belarus | Blocked | Reported by most sources |
| Iran | Blocked | Sanctions and FATF |
| Iraq | Blocked | FATF listing |
| Myanmar | Blocked | FATF listing |
| North Korea | Blocked | Sanctions and FATF |
| Comoros | Blocked | Licence jurisdiction excludes its own territory |
| Brazil | Allowed | Pix supported in the cashier |
| Turkey | Allowed | Not listed in any source we checked |
| Canada | Allowed | Not listed; provincial rules are your own concern |
| Japan | Allowed | Not listed |
| India | Allowed | Not listed; state rules vary |
Read the caveat before the list
Independent sources do not agree on this list. The core — the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands, Austria, Australia and the FATF blacklist jurisdictions — appears consistently everywhere we looked. Italy, Belgium and Poland appear in some accounts and not others.
Poland is the strangest case. It is reported as restricted, yet Blik — a Polish domestic payment rail with essentially no use outside Poland — appears in the fiat on-ramp inside the cashier. Either the restriction lists circulating are out of date, or Blik is there for a reason we have not identified. We have not resolved it, so we are not going to pretend we have.
The only authoritative version of this list is the terms of service on duel.com. Everything on this page, including the table above, is a secondary account assembled from public sources and our own checks. If you are anywhere near a borderline case, read the operator's own terms before funding an account. That is not a disclaimer to cover ourselves — it is the practical difference between playing and losing a balance.
Why the list is this long
The reason is the licence, and it follows from how online gambling regulation actually works.
Large European markets operate closed licensing regimes. Germany's state treaty, France's ANJ framework, Spain's DGOJ, the Dutch KSA and the UK Gambling Commission each require an operator serving their residents to hold a local permit, meet local technical standards and pay local tax. Obtaining one is expensive, slow, and generally incompatible with running a no-KYC crypto casino at all — the same regimes that require the licence also require the identity verification.
An operator holding only an Anjouan Gaming Authority permit therefore has two choices: serve those markets unlawfully and eventually face enforcement, or block them. Duel blocks them. That is the correct decision and it is also, from a player's point of view, the direct cost of the privacy described on the no-KYC page. The two are the same fact seen from opposite sides.
The United States is a separate matter again. Federal and state law make offshore operation legally hazardous regardless of licence, and essentially every offshore crypto casino blocks it for that reason.
The FATF-listed jurisdictions — Iran, North Korea, Myanmar and the rest of the blacklist — are excluded on anti-money-laundering grounds and would be excluded by any operator anywhere, licence notwithstanding.
What an offshore licence actually is
The word "licensed" does a lot of work in casino marketing and covers an enormous range. Understanding where the Anjouan Gaming Authority permit sits explains both this country list and the risk profile of playing here at all.
At the top are the tier-one regulators: the UK Gambling Commission, the Malta Gaming Authority, and the national bodies in Germany, Spain, France, Denmark and Sweden. These impose capital requirements, segregated player funds, independent game testing, mandatory identity verification, deposit limits, self-exclusion registers and a complaints process with genuine teeth. Getting one takes months and costs a great deal. In exchange, a player with a frozen balance has somewhere real to go.
At the other end sit the offshore jurisdictions — Anjouan, Curaçao, Costa Rica. These issue permits quickly and cheaply, impose far lighter obligations, and offer players correspondingly little. The licence is not fictional; there are conditions and they can be revoked. But a dispute resolution process that consists of emailing a small regulatory office in another hemisphere is not equivalent to a UKGC complaint, and it would be dishonest to present it as one.
Duel holds permit ALSI-202411026-FI1. That is a real, checkable licence at the lighter end of the scale. It is precisely what allows the site to skip identity verification, run 15+ cryptocurrencies and pay withdrawals in under a minute — and it is precisely why the country list above is as long as it is. The privacy and the restrictions come from the same source.
Grey markets and the space between
Countries do not divide neatly into permitted and forbidden. Most of the world sits in a third category that this page's table flattens.
Regulated and closed. The market requires a local licence and enforces it. Germany, the UK, Spain, France, the Netherlands, Australia. Duel blocks these because serving them would be unlawful for an operator holding what it holds.
Explicitly prohibited. Online gambling is illegal for the player as well as the operator. The enforcement reality varies enormously — some jurisdictions block payments and pursue operators, others have a law nobody has applied in a decade.
Unregulated. No domestic licensing framework exists, so offshore operators serve the market without breaching anything specific. Much of Latin America, Asia and Africa falls here. This is where the bulk of offshore crypto gambling actually happens, and it is why Brazil and Turkey are on the allowed side of the table.
The distinction that matters for you is between the operator's obligations and your own. Duel blocking a country tells you where the operator may not go. It tells you nothing about whether gambling is lawful for you personally, which is a separate question governed by your own jurisdiction — and in several countries the answer differs by state or province even where the national position is settled.
If the list changes
It will. Licensing conditions change, jurisdictions introduce frameworks, and operators adjust their blocks in response. Brazil is the obvious candidate: it has been building a regulated framework for years, and if that framework closes to unlicensed operators the way the European ones did, Brazil moves from the allowed column to the blocked one.
An account in a country that becomes restricted after you opened it is a genuinely awkward position, and the terms generally allow the operator to close it and return the balance rather than void it — but "generally" is doing work in that sentence and the outcome depends on the specific terms at the time. If you are playing from a market with active regulatory movement, it is worth not carrying a large balance on the site for longer than you need to.
Checking your own position before you deposit
Three steps, and together they take about five minutes.
Read the operator’s terms, not a review. Including this one. The restricted list on duel.com is the version that governs your account; every secondary account, ours included, can be out of date the day it is written.
Register and try a small deposit before a large one. If registration is blocked outright, you have your answer at no cost. If it succeeds, that is not proof you are permitted — as the section above explains, the check that matters happens at withdrawal — but it does establish that the operator is not blocking your country at the front door.
Test a withdrawal early. Deposit a modest amount, play a little, and withdraw a portion before building any balance you would mind losing. This is sound practice at any offshore casino regardless of geography, and it converts the worst failure mode — discovering the problem with four figures on the account — into a minor inconvenience.
The general principle is worth stating plainly: an offshore licence means the operator’s obligations to you are thin, so the burden of checking sits with you. That is the actual trade being made in exchange for no identity verification and one-minute payouts. It is a reasonable trade for a lot of players. It is a bad one for anyone who skips the checking.
What happens if you play from a blocked country
Not what most people expect. You are not turned away at the door in a way that makes the problem obvious immediately.
Registration will usually succeed. Deposits will credit. Games will run and rakeback will accrue exactly as advertised. Everything works, sometimes for months, and the account looks entirely normal.
The problem appears at withdrawal, which is when the account receives its first real scrutiny and when the balance is at its largest. A geographic breach at that point does not produce a warning and a request to stop. It produces a voided balance, and the terms give the operator the right to do exactly that.
This is why the restriction is worth checking before the first deposit rather than treating it as fine print. The failure mode is not inconvenience — it is total loss of everything in the account, discovered at the moment you try to take it out.
Detection is not just your IP address
The assumption behind most VPN use is that geographic restriction is an IP check and a VPN defeats an IP check. The first half is wrong.
Operators combine signals. Browser timezone and locale rarely match a VPN exit node. Device fingerprints persist across sessions and across VPN switches. The wallet address you withdraw to has an on-chain history, and if it links to an exchange account verified in a blocked jurisdiction the connection is trivially visible. Payment card BINs on the fiat on-ramp carry a country. Language settings, keyboard layout, connection latency patterns — none of these are covered by routing traffic through another country.
You do not need to fail all of these. One clear mismatch at withdrawal review is enough, and withdrawal review is precisely when someone looks.
If your country is on the list
The honest answer is that Duel is not available to you, and no workaround changes that in a way you can rely on. A balance you cannot withdraw is not a balance.
If you are in the UK, Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands or Australia, your domestic market has licensed operators with real regulatory recourse — worse odds and mandatory verification, but a regulator who will actually take your complaint. That is a genuine trade, and for a lot of players it is the right one.
If you are in the United States, the legal position is more complicated than a casino review can usefully cover, and it varies by state.
And if your country is not on this list at all — Brazil, Turkey, Canada, Japan, India and most of the world — none of this applies to you. Check the operator's terms once to confirm, then read the full review.